虞海
Se unió el 10 ago 2008
Último comentario: hace 14 años por 虞海 en el tema Editions
Editions
editarYeah, probably the names came from china and India, but those articles are about especifically of japanese traditions. Please stop doing those edits. --r@ge やった!!!やった!!! 07:52 27 dic 2009 (UTC)
- That's not "especifically" of japanese traditions. It's cultures of India, China (incl. Tibetan Vajrayana buddhism), and Japan. Japan is only a country at the end of the route. Using Indian name (origin name) is neutral, considering it's public culture, not culture of a certain country. --虞海 (discusión) 07:56 27 dic 2009 (UTC)
- Of course that isn't correct. For example, the article Fudō Myō-ō is especifically about the japanese version of that deity. If you want to also reflect the chinese/indian name you should make a redirection and add the information about the origin and not just erase the existing information. You could also make a new entry about the chinese/indian version, because as you know the japanese version of budism made it's own way and took the national traditions, mixing some customs with shintō. --r@ge やった!!!やった!!! 08:11 27 dic 2009 (UTC)
- If I do that those article will be merged. At least in English Wikipedia it only one article. One deity, one article. --虞海 (discusión) 08:48 27 dic 2009 (UTC)
- That's what I told ya, you could merge the information in the same article without just deleting the japanese information. For the last time, keep deleting information in that way. Greetings. --r@ge やった!!!やった!!! 10:34 27 dic 2009 (UTC)
- Well, when the content is complete Japanese I need to for further "conflict, counteract and at last neutralization", otherwise primary and secondary will be inversed. Now I agree to use the Indian origin. --虞海 (discusión) 06:34 4 ene 2010 (UTC)
- That's what I told ya, you could merge the information in the same article without just deleting the japanese information. For the last time, keep deleting information in that way. Greetings. --r@ge やった!!!やった!!! 10:34 27 dic 2009 (UTC)
- If I do that those article will be merged. At least in English Wikipedia it only one article. One deity, one article. --虞海 (discusión) 08:48 27 dic 2009 (UTC)
- Of course that isn't correct. For example, the article Fudō Myō-ō is especifically about the japanese version of that deity. If you want to also reflect the chinese/indian name you should make a redirection and add the information about the origin and not just erase the existing information. You could also make a new entry about the chinese/indian version, because as you know the japanese version of budism made it's own way and took the national traditions, mixing some customs with shintō. --r@ge やった!!!やった!!! 08:11 27 dic 2009 (UTC)