Archivo:Conglomerate & sandstone (Sharon Formation, Lower Pennsylvanian; Virginia Kendall Ledges, Ohio, USA) 4 (41607855960).jpg

Ver la imagen en su resolución original (4000 × 3000 píxeles; tamaño de archivo: 6,63 MB; tipo MIME: image/jpeg)
![]() |
Este es un archivo de Wikimedia Commons, un depósito de contenido libre hospedado por la Fundación Wikimedia. Más abajo se reproduce su página de descripción con la información sobre su origen y licencia. |
Resumen
DescripciónConglomerate & sandstone (Sharon Formation, Lower Pennsylvanian; Virginia Kendall Ledges, Ohio, USA) 4 (41607855960).jpg |
Conglomerate & sandstone in the Pennsylvanian of Ohio, USA. (Synthesized from info. provided by several geologists during the 2003 Annual Field Conference of the Great Lakes Section, Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists): The Lower Pennsylvanian Sharon Formation is a 10-15 meter thick, ledge-forming, erosion-resistant unit. The Sharon is paleovalley-filling in places, so it is thicker than 10-15 meters in some spots. The jointing patterns of the Sharon Formation allow for 3-D examination around large blocks of outcrop - can see the 3-D architecture of sedimentary structures. The Pottsville Group lies over a major unconformity, which was formed by eustatic sealevel fall & erosion. The Sharon Formation is the basal unit of the Pottsville sediments over this unconformity. In terms of the tectonic setting, this is in the Appalachian Foreland Basin. What influenced sedimentation and sediment supply of the Sharon Formation during the Early Pennsylvanian? Probably a migrating forebulge and Early Pennsylvanian climatic changes. The Sharon is correlatable with the Olean Conglomerate in Pennsylvania. Both the Sharon and the Olean are time-equivalent to the Tumbling Hill Member & the Huylkill Member of the lower Pottsville Formation of central Pennsylvania (both of those members are below the major unconformity in Pennsylvania, unlike in northeastern Ohio). The Sharon Conglomerate/Formation & the Olean Conglomerate were deposited under strong north-to-south paleoflow conditions. About twelve lithofacies can be seen in the Sharon Formation in the Akron, Ohio area. The Sharon Formation is dominantly conglomerate and sandstone, with lots of sedimentary structures. It is light on fine-grained materials. The Sharon has horizontally bedded gravels, cross-bedded gravels (including trough and tabular cross bedding), deformed/overturned cross-bed sets, basal scours up to 2 meters deep (but typically 0.5 to 1 meter deep; scours are backfilled by dune/bar back migration), whole channel fills, chute fills, and gravel bar platform deposits (usually 1-2 meters thick in the Sharon; these include bar head deposits, bar core deposits, bar tail deposits, and bar margin deposits - can usually use the presence of imbricated clasts to ID bar-head & bar-core portions of gravel bar platforms, but in the Sharon, clasts are mostly spheroidal, so it is difficult to tell specific portions of gravel platforms here). In the gravel-rich Sharon deposits, get calculated average bankfull depths of 2.1 meters, 19.9 meter average paleochannel widths, and 34.3 meter maximum paleochannel widths. Get different numbers for the sandy Sharon deposits. The Sharon is typically more conglomeratic at the base & more sandy near the top. The Sharon’s interpreted depositional environment is gravel & sand bedload streams. Paleovalleys underneath the Sharon Formation were formed when the subsidence rate was greater than the sediment supply. Paleovalley backfilling (i.e., Sharon deposits) occurred when the subsidence rate was less than the sediment supply. The change in fluvial style seen in Sharon deposits is probably due to filling & overtopping of paleovalleys. Beds of the Sharon Formation are usually cliff-forming. The Sharon in the Akron area consists of quartz-pebble conglomerate & quartzose sandstone & pebbly quartzose sandstone & sandy quartz-pebble conglomerate & some lenses or thin intervals of granulestone. The basal Sharon is conglomeratic - the “lower conglomerate”. An “upper conglomerate” can be seen in places - it is usually quite thin (1-2 pebbles thick in places), and in some places, it splits into two horizons; in some places it’s not there at all. Pebbles are almost entirely white vein quartz, with an uncertain source from the north. Detrital muscovite in the Sharon has been dated to about 370 and 406 Ma (Devonian), so the source area includes Acadian Orogeny materials. The Sharon has relatively common cross-bedding, with a few overturned cross-beds visible in areas. Abundant iron oxide staining is present in the Sharon sandstones, with a variety of morphologies - this can weather out as resistant ridges or as 3-D surfaces. Many vugs have thick goethite linings. Many goethite-stained quartz pebbles are present. Seeps & springs occur sporadically along the sandstones of the lower Sharon Formation in places. These spring waters have widely variable pH and TDS (total dissolved solids). Some dry springs are present - conduits without water emerging. A few places in basal Sharon strata have obvious rip-up shale clasts, derived from uppermost Meadville Shale beds (below the Mississippian-Pennsylvanian unconformity). One outcrop is known with many Meadville Shale clasts mixed in with Sharon quartz pebbles - this appears to represent paleobank failure of Meadville material during near-earliest Sharon deposition. The outcrop shown above is at Virginia Kendall Ledges in Cuyahoga Valley National Park. Virginia Kendall Ledges is an isolated platform of Sharon Formation, surrounded by a lower land surface of Lower Mississippian Cuyahoga Formation shales & siltstones & sandstones. The lower Sharon Formation at this site is quite pebbly - many pebble-filled channelform features are present. Upon 3-D examination of their architecture, these are not channels or chutes, but are interpreted by Professor Neil Wells as bar confluence scours with subsequent pebble fills. The edges of the Virginia Kendall Ledges platform have large Sharon blocks separating from the rest of the platform. Abundant overturned recumbent cross beds are present - some of the world's best developed and best exposed examples. The mechanism by which crossbeds get overturned seems straightforward (unidirectional shear by fluvial currents), but the cause is not clearly understood - some cohesive agent may be required? Someone suggested biomats. Some of the scour pits in this area seem to have fairly steep margins - perhaps whatever cohesive agent was responsible for simple deformation of crossbeds was also responsible for overly steep, stable margins of depressions/chutes/channels/scours. Stratigraphy: Sharon Formation (also known as Sharon Sandstone or Sharon Conglomerate or Sharon Member), lower Pottsville Group, upper Lower Pennsylvanian Locality: Virginia Kendall Ledges, Cuyahoga Valley National Park, north of Akron, northern Summit County, northeastern Ohio, USA (~~vicinity of 41° 13' 44.76" North latitude, 81° 30' 37.76" West longitude) |
Fecha | |
Fuente | Conglomerate & sandstone (Sharon Formation, Lower Pennsylvanian; Virginia Kendall Ledges, Ohio, USA) 4 |
Autor | James St. John |
Licencia


- Eres libre:
- de compartir – de copiar, distribuir y transmitir el trabajo
- de remezclar – de adaptar el trabajo
- Bajo las siguientes condiciones:
- atribución – Debes otorgar el crédito correspondiente, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si realizaste algún cambio. Puedes hacerlo de cualquier manera razonable pero no de manera que sugiera que el licenciante te respalda a ti o al uso que hagas del trabajo.
![]() |
Esta imagen fue publicada en Flickr por James St. John en https://flickr.com/photos/47445767@N05/41607855960 (archivo). La imagen fue revisada el 8 de octubre de 2019 por el robot FlickreviewR 2 y confirmó tener licencia bajo los términos de cc-by-2.0. |
8 de octubre de 2019
Leyendas
Elementos representados en este archivo
representa a
Algún valor sin elemento de Wikidata
16 may 2018
0,5 segundo
4,5
14,303 milímetro
image/jpeg
b1c39b678a773944f807ee2769ac437f38a06f2c
6 952 491 byte
3000 píxel
4000 píxel
Historial del archivo
Haz clic sobre una fecha y hora para ver el archivo tal como apareció en ese momento.
Fecha y hora | Miniatura | Dimensiones | Usuario | Comentario | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
actual | 05:56 8 oct 2019 | ![]() | 4000 × 3000 (6,63 MB) | Ser Amantio di Nicolao | Transferred from Flickr via #flickr2commons |
Usos del archivo
La siguiente página usa este archivo:
Metadatos
Este archivo contiene información adicional, probablemente añadida por la cámara digital o el escáner usado para crearlo o digitalizarlo.
Si el archivo ha sido modificado desde su estado original, pueden haberse perdido algunos detalles.
Fabricante de la cámara | Canon |
---|---|
Modelo de cámara | Canon PowerShot D10 |
Tiempo de exposición | 1/2 seg (0,5) |
Número F | f/4,5 |
Fecha y hora de la generación de los datos | 13:30 16 may 2018 |
Longitud focal de la lente | 14,303 mm |
Anchura | 4000 px |
Altura | 3000 px |
Bits por componente |
|
Composición de pixel | RGB |
Orientación | Normal |
Número de componentes | 3 |
Resolución horizontal | 180 ppp |
Resolución vertical | 180 ppp |
Software usado | Adobe Photoshop Elements 13.0 (Macintosh) |
Fecha y hora de modificación del archivo | 11:05 11 jul 2018 |
Posicionamientos Y y C | Co-localizados |
Calificación de velocidad ISO | 80 |
Versión de Exif | 2.21 |
Fecha y hora de la digitalización | 13:30 16 may 2018 |
Significado de cada componente |
|
Modo de compresión de la imagen | 3 |
Velocidad de obturación APEX | 1 |
Apertura APEX | 4,34375 |
Sesgo de exposición | −0,66666666666667 |
Valor máximo de apertura | 4,34375 APEX (f/4,51) |
Modo de medición | Patrón |
Flash | No se disparó el flash, disparo de flash anulado |
Versión admitida de Flashpix | 1 |
Espacio de color | sRGB |
Resolución X del plano focal | 16 460,905349794 |
Resolución Y del plano focal | 16 483,516483516 |
Unidad de resolución del plano focal | pulgadas |
Método de sensor | Sensor de área de color de un chip |
Fuente de archivo | Cámara digital |
Procesador personalizado de imagen | Proceso normal |
Modo de exposición | Exposición manual |
Balance de blanco | Balance de blanco automático |
Razón de zoom digital | 1 |
Tipo de captura de escena | Paisaje |
Lente utilizada | 6.2-18.6 mm |
Fecha en la cual fueron modificados por última vez los metadatos | 07:05 11 jul 2018 |
Id. único del documento original | E2B59C7325B935925D96223DC9FB81DE |
Título de la imagen |